This is included in that long-dormant series for reasons which, I hope, will become obvious by the time this is over.
I am left with some thoughts after the Clancy mistrial: She admitted to killing the kids, but postpartum depression, etc. put the trial to an insanity defense.
And it appears that a jury of nine women and three men in Massachusetts had only one (presumably male) juror not go with the insanity defense. Mistrial, we'll do it again.
And the bleating and the raising of the groyper pro-rape contingent on X (to the point I have drawn a second suspension in less than 12 hours on my... 10th... 12th... more??? X account yesterday for basically telling one of them that if we meet, I will kick his ass and he better come armed to shoot me -- and he better if he wants to spew the bullshit) has left me with the following thoughts:
1) If you are interested in removing not only the privilege of voting, but also all involvement of women in places of power, influence, or safety... How, in that world, can you have any more children being born at all? Because the ultimate place of those three things is motherhood - and in polite White Right circles, that's the only purpose you have for women in the first place.
If some or all women aren't fit for voting or office or safety issues, etc. because of hormone possibilities, they sure as fuck aren't fit for carrying or raising children. Especially in a world where all privileges and positions are removed from women. Would that not immediately result in retaliation against the power (murdering more children)?
2) Some people (probably pro-rape men, mostly) are asking that if the hormonal defense can be used for murder, then why can't it be used for rape??
....
....
Like it has been for years by valuable men like the Stubenville, OH football team, the Stanford swimmer, etc.?
Rapists like Bill Cosby and Donald Trump?
3) People are forgetting she doesn't "get away with it" if she does get the insanity defense. That means she probably gets permanently locked up.
Of course, I guess any result short of someone finding where she is being kept and shooting her full of holes (or doing so in open court) would not satisfy people.
Which, of course, leads to my fourth and final point...
4) Much like courting transgenderism as mental illness of it's own right, is this another move toward identifying those to be considered mentally ill and executing them all? (Transgenders, eventually the LGBs, homeless people, many prisoners, etc.?)
Something to keep in mind as the White Right Men (and some of the women almost certainly raped and beaten into submission) are spouting off...
No comments:
Post a Comment