- Buffalo: Jalen Kilgore, $5,560
- New Orleans: Danny Stutsman, $7,011
- Indianapolis: Cam Taylor-Britt, Striking, etc., $7,791
- Minnesota: Jermar Jefferson, Face Mask, $5,583
- Pittsburgh: Donelko Slaughter, Taunting, $4,917
The truth is not what actually happened. It's what you can ENFORCE happened. It's ALL enforcement.
Said the same thing on the Kevin McHale situation in Minnesota a lot of years back, and I think that might pale to this.
The repeated salary-cap transgressions of the Clippers mean:
And it is endemic to the Fine Blotters I used to post here. We'll see if I get the time and want this year.
An OFFICIAL NFL Points of Emphasis For Supplemental Discipline has been released.
The NFL has put out the following five Player Safety Fouls for Point of Emphasis this year:
The viral brawl in which the Steiner kid who's already suspended for PED's German suplexed a player has gotten both the Dallas Cowboys and New Orleans Saints $500,000 league fines for lack of sportsmanship.
Once again, I must remind you: One of the things that the believers state with respect in their belief the NFL is not rigged is the fact that the league's largest cash-cow, the Cowboys, hasn't won a title or sniffed one in decades.
Again, a champion (not unlike some of the rigged music competition shows) represents the brand -- and it's as true for the NFL as it is for American Idol.
EDIT TO ADD 5:05 PM PDT: Sounds like the Giants and Dolphins are probably next. Big brawl today at a joint practice.
USA Today: DraftKings and FanDuel have already spent $72,000,000 on the midterm elections -- making gambling the third highest campaign contributor behind crypto and tech.
And, in the "no coincidences" file...
Fortune: Gambling on sports (and this probably is only the legal handles, and does not include states which do allow Indian casinos to do sports-gambling (Wisconsin and Florida are two), nor the prediction markets which have muscled into sports-betting and can do so in states where sports-betting is illegal...) now is not only the largest entertainment method in the country at $166 billion, it outspends music, concerts, books, museums, and movies, by more than double -- combined!! ($70 billion between the five, none above $20 billion)
Dana White has said that tonight's christening of a probable execution chamber on the grounds of the White House should draw Super Bowl-level numbers.
No joke: Here it is.
Donald Trump has said that the 80th birthday spectacular will be the most-viewed sporting event of all time.
During the World Cup.
Let that idiocy process.
The rest of the political-registration survey from earlier was found by our friends at Close Call Sports and they published the findings on their Discord. They finally also allowed me to find the link to the article with all of the information.
None of what at least the charts they publicized should be of any degree of surprise...
A side chart on the NFL first...
Among NFL players, defensive and skill-position players tend to lean the most Democratic, while special teams players are the most Republican. Quarterbacks fall somewhere in between the two. pic.twitter.com/QcioxpdKDR
— VoteHub (@VoteHub) January 20, 2026
Defense usually scales Democratic (by well over 30 points), offense and special teams Republican.
And don't fall for VoteHub's trying to sugar-coat it: Quarterbacks skew Republican by about 13 points.
But the bigger lack of surprise is in the general findings:
Well, I will say one thing for them, even though my first glance of this would be "This is what this nation has to deal with with MAGA.", it certainly does fall under the purview of this website.
That said, a YouTube video I was presented with this morning basically lays a charge which would not only end the Nielsen company for massive orchestrated fraud, it might finally break the national chokehold of the National Religion, because, if the Nielsen company did as this video charges, the Nielsen company would be exposed as being "on the take" with at least the NFL, if not far more companies.
Not only that, but the numbers would be utterly devastating, and many advertisers would be left asking a LOT of questions.
So here's the video:
Sure. They were lying about the game. 29% less viewership than last year. And more ditched af halftime. Nielsen fessed up and you can check the Samba or Luminate data. Look up Forbes. They concur with VR. https://t.co/c3SINCTHGW
— Istaphobos (@IstaPhobos) February 12, 2026
The level of MAGA victory alleged by this video, using Forbes, Samba, Luminate, or whatever other numbers you would have would be devastating.
Istaphobos did the work for me on the key number I was looking for, but the charge is basically that they overreported the game ratings by over a quarter. At that point, almost 40% of the viewers left for Terrorist Point USA. Istaphobos, in another post, actually claims the walkaway rate was over 50%.
But let's go with the 38% walkaway rate alleged, use the numbers at least from last year's game numbers, and show how devastating this charge is, and what could probably result:
Nielsen alleges 127.7 million watched last year's Super Bowl.
If this is the case, and Istaphobos' claims as to the success of the MAGA/Terrorist Point boycott are valid, this would mean that the number of people actually watching the Super Bowl itself would be (and this is if you believe last year's Nielsen number -- which you then CAN'T!) only 90.7M.
That's for starters, then we get to the main event.
If, from that number, you then have a 38% (and I'm using the conservative number, pardon the pun -- Istaphobos claims the walkaway was half, if not more) walkaway rate, then Bad Bunny, et. al. would have performed in front of only 56.2 million viewers.
So, (bolding for emphasis so that if someone doesn't want to read my supporting claptrap, he or she can at least get to the money numbers here) for comparison (and, again, this is using numbers from LIX which would then be almost-instantly discredited!):
Game: Nielsen: 124.9 million Samba/Luminate/Forbes alleged: 90.7 million.
That would be an overreport of 34.2 million viewers, or an overreport of 27.3% -- on the game.
Halftime: Nielsen: 128.2 million Samba/Luminate/Forbes alleged: 56.2 million viewers...
... a staggering overreport of SEVENTY-TWO MILLION VIEWERS, or 56.1%!
I have already told Interphos that the person needs to be in contact with relevant lawyers. The level of fraud being alleged here would kill Nielsen. It would end the company.
Every company who paid a reported $8-10 million for 30 seconds would be left scratching their heads -- including, almost certainly, companies who laid their entire corporate futures on the line for the 30 seconds (which we know has happened in past Super Bowls).
This might finally break the chokehold that The National Religion of Football would have on the nation, because it would expose a deliberate conspiracy between the NFL and relevant companies.
I have little doubt that the numbers could well be somewhat cooked -- but to this extent? 27% overreport on the game, 56% on the halftime?
And the discrediting wouldn't end there. It would raise an even bigger question: How much does the NFL pay on a weekly basis to cook the books on the ratings it reports week to week?
Someone needs to contact lawyers with this information. NOW.
I've already seen this three times this morning from White Right influencers.
This should scare the NFL. pic.twitter.com/4qbiFX9BaA
— The American Girl (@TheAmericanGrl) February 11, 2026
It's a chart from a group called Samba, an alternate TV ratings situation to Nielsen, which is openly charging that Nielsen is blatantly lying about it's numbers for Super Bowl LX, especially as they relate to the Bad Bunny halftime show.
Remember that Nielsen has stated that viewership was going up into the halftime show and peaked during it.
Samba is charging a flagrant 10% drop in the number of people watching Bad Bunny vs. the previous part of the game. If this is the case, it would mean that Nielsen is actually overcounting the halftime show by at least a factor of 15-20%.
They're saying 110M (at best! -- because I can't think they then believe the Super Bowl numbers are accurate either!) saw Bad Bunny.
And the numbers came down today:
Duren is an Eastern Conference All-Star reserve. As of right now, that has not been removed. It should be. Not only because of the nature of the event, but he started the damn thing too!
First off, I think all the suspensions are low. This had multiple flare-ups and the very real possibility the game should've been terminated.
Second, here's Stewart, from Spotrac, in his six-year NBA career:
That should be at least TWENTY.
Enough with "The Show Must Go On".
That's three high-level suspensions in basically a calendar year. He leaves the bench to join the altercation. Headlock. Punches. Police are involved in the altercation (which should've terminated the game immediately and for the night -- that's a general pet peeve of mine, that any time the cops get involved, that's it for the night).
A survey came out of 24 states worth of NFL players.
752 voting registrations were looked at, about the equivalent of 14 NFL rosters, slightly less than half of the league. The company doing the survey, VoteHub, probably couldn't gain access -- legally or otherwise -- to the others.
The team with the highest skew of each party may surprise you, both ways.
The Republican winner? The San Francisco 49ers, making the team itself probably one of the least representative parts of their city.
The same can be said for the Democratic winner: The Green Bay Packers, in a very Trump-loving part of Wisconsin with a very rural fanbase.
Overall, of at least the 752 they could find: 44% independent, 34% Democrat, 20% Republican.
One more thought: Could this be one reason that two 49er players have been shot in their city in the last couple of years. Asking for a friend.
The Ratings Report.
This is usually true every year, because the Super Bowl is, and largely by a multiplicative amount, the most-watched event of the television year.
More so this year with the Terrorist Point USA and MAGA screaming.
Well, the verdict came in late this afternoon.
And, per Sports Media Watch:
If there was a boycott, then MAGA and TPUSA can claim a fair, if not substantial, victory in the ratings numbers (that is, the percentage of all television sets viewing the given event).
Super Bowl LX, with a comparative game structure (basic non-competitive blowout throughout), lost 6% of that percentage of TV sets viewing.
LIX: 41.7
LX: 39.4
The share was also down 4 points -- 83% of all television sets turned on during the game were watching the game at LIX. LX? 79%.
It is the first non-COVID Super Bowl to fall below a 40 since 1990. To give a comparison, once you go back from 1990, you'd have to go back to Super Bowl IV to get a rating that low.
That's the good news for TPUSA and MAGA.
There is some bad news however, and it comes in two flavors.
First, the viewer total for Super Bowl LX was 124.9 million, a decline of slightly over 2%.
LIX: 127.7M
LX: 124.9M
TPUSA/MAGA may still attempt to claim a victory here as well, but they might have a bit of a problem here more than above. Two reasons:
First, the number still represents the second-highest Neilsen viewership in Super Bowl history (behind LIX).
And second is this little thing called Taylor Swift. One COULD make the case the entire almost three million could've been the Swifties tuning out because their girl's fiancee was not in the game.
And then the main event: The halftime show.
LIX claimed 133.5 million, a Super Bowl record.
LX did fall down about 4%, to 128.2 million. Far below claims of 10, 20 million -- I heard one claim on their social media saying half the viewers of the game left before the show.
They can claim a victory here too, maybe. But there's one problem:
Almost three million of that would've had to have been a full boycott of the game, leaving the real departure to the Charlie Kirk Satanist Memorial Event somewhere around 2 - 2 1/2 million.
So, verdict?
It might well be a victory for MAGA, but it will be very overstated on their part.