He had this to say today, tangentially to the May 10 Daily...
"Finally got around to that documentary you never told us about. Tell me, how easy was it to lie about everything you said in the interview?"
First, let's get the rest of the group up to speed...
I know there are any number of ways you can see this documentary (most are a function of some degree of subscription service, either Broadway-related or documentary-related), but, a number of years ago, an Australian documentarian (Mark Dooley) did a documentary on Broadway superfans entitled Repeat Attenders.
Coulda sworn I've mentioned it before, but...
The first interview (and, to date, last) I have done on the Gibson arrest 25 years ago was the main "hook" of the documentary, probably much to the chagrin of the legitimate theatre superfans otherwise chronicled therein.
(Though I will say that it is good evidence of the situation I spoke of when I talked about the Chiefs superfan headed to prison for robbery: The only difference between "superfan" and "stalker" being the permission of the entity the person is a fan of.
And don't get me started on the new parlance of "stan"...)
But I think "nobody" has dropped into what will probably be a quite instructive exercise.
So I asked him the following in the comments, and we'll see if/when he responds. I am interested in what he says, this is not rhetorical:
If you believe everything I said in Repeat Attenders was a lie, then what is (your version of) the truth with respect to the Debbie Gibson incident?
I have a couple theories, both of which would go a long way to explain why This Blog Should Not Exist, but I want to hear you say it...
I also have a theory on several posts rendered "Sensitive Content", and at least one action taken against my social media accounts... If this theory is correct, it could well be an official act, ifyouknowwhatIamsaying...
UPDATE: You can read his answer below. I'll respond as either part of Part Three in two weeks or in a 3.001.
You saw her as the perfect star above all else, yet the moment she changed formats from what you believed made her perfect, and after you looked at other stars' career paths similar to what you believe she was going down, you became obsessive over saving her from herself, and it reached the point where you decided to confront her after numerous attempts to get you to stop. You aren't the hero you thought you were being, and ever since then you embraced being the heroic villain with tendencies and ideas that criminally insane people get shocked by. No wonder you frolic on a message board with dozens of Nazis and history remembers you as nothing more than an obsessed stalker who most likely wanted her dead. You've been relegated to nothing more than a Talkin' Broadway post, and a small footnote on Debbie Gibson's wikipedia page, and it's all you've been, yet you act like you're some hunted down renegade, daring anyone who doesn't like you to shoot you. You're the homeless guy people give Jack Links to for some good karma, quit acting like you're the savior of the world. You lied so people could think you changed, when in reality, the only change that happens around here is your profile from "54, opinionated, and not usually very happy," to "55, opinionated, and not usually very happy." Think about that while you shitpost on that Nazi College Football board of yours
ReplyDelete