This Blog Should Not Exist, Part 3.03: Fuck YOU, Karl Denninger, You Fucking Bigot

I've already deleted two salvos at the guy from The Market Ticker, Karl Denninger, about his anti-transgender bigotry.

The bigotry in this country has gotten so pronounced that most statements made well-meaning on the subject are either considered condescending or even backhanded compliments to even make things worse than the bigotry itself!

So, on Tuesday, Denninger posted his latest screed, stating the LGBTQ community is so dangerous because it actually endangers the future of human life itself.

Well, Mr. Denninger, in the same vein as your bigotry:

FUCK YOU

It is eminently clear, Mr. Denninger, that, as much as you want to state you are against the concept of rape (going so far as to censor the word every time it appears on your site), you are actually, quite conversely, FOR IT.

It's not hard to see why:  Because your idea of the concept of rape is completely and utterly backwards.

As many women whose bodies have been scattered at the floor of the American Sports Machine (be they prospective Olympic athletes, girlfriends of the star HS quarterback, or just the wrong woman showing up when the athlete is horny and drunk Saturday night at the bar) would attest, "No" don't mean shit.

You say that the only difference between sex and rape is consent -- when the actual only difference between the two is the ability and enforcement of such lack of consent.

Your bigotry against transgender people, especially -- but, just as such, your statements here are indicating that you have a compelling interest (perhaps even beyond governmental) of the survival of the species.  Hence, you have no problem stating that it is the ONLY "legitimate purpose" one has.

At which point, you will impose that upon and hence rape every LGBTQ you can find.

Sorry, that's what it is.

I would like him to come out and admit that procreation is the sole legitimate purpose one should have under the law, all other situations (stable family unit, jobs/financials, etc.) means to that end.

But, at that point, over and above the material rape of those who would want to love outside the cis-het paradigm, you'd have to remove three sets of people from the equation, the third being the same canard I tried to use against the Proposition 8 bigots here in California:

1. The infertile -- those who can't add to the population (with probable exception to those who already did).
2. Those who, like me, WILL NOT under any circumstances add to this population.
3. Or (and, reminder:  this is the canard that if we have such a vested interest in who pairs, the state is doing an exceedingly poor job of it!) those for whom it is not in society's interest to procreate, for whatever verifiable reason.

So, I see your Fuck You and raise you a Fuck You, Denninger.