This Blog Should Not Exist, Part 2.01: An Unscheduled Part As We Await New York And Beyond

(For the record, the grand jury in the Trump-Daniels situation did not meet on Wednesday, so push everything back at least one additional day.)

As I said before, I did not intend to do a "2.01", but, given the present circumstances in New York City and beyond, I felt the need to.

(And, also for the record, the fact that Trump would be indicted in New York, once this grand jury finishes, is mere coincidence to my posting this.  Though it would give me insight to see if they actually DO treat him like most other criminals.)

As everyone awaits the apparent criminal indictment of a former President of the United States of America, I sit here and think of everything going on and I basically came to the very quick conclusion that much of this also -- but for separate reasons -- falls under "This Blog Should Not Exist".

For those keeping score:  A grand jury in New York, one of several impaneled for various Trump criminal charges, is seeing if there is evidence to charge Trump with crimes associated with an apparent "hush money" payment to Stormy Daniels, the porn actress who told us all how little manhood The Orange Oompa-Loompa really has.

Admittedly, among the type of stuff he might well be charged with, it's about as minor as it might come, except for a couple of very interesting realities...

First, and probably central to "This Blog Should Not Exist"is the concept of not just there being the classic thought of "Two Sets Of Laws", but Trump's central campaign rhetoric in 2016:  That he's above the law, and so is anyone of enough "legitimate purpose" to society.

Now, I will be the first to admit that the law is no longer a function of what you do.  It's a function of who you are, and, often more importantly, who you are not.

That's one level of it.  When one states, as Trump did, that he can murder someone in broad daylight on 5th Avenue in New York City and get away with it, that's another.

When you state that, should you have the importance, you can grab any woman by the pussy and be applauded for it, that adds another level to it.

And when a bunch of men (and women who wish to be subjugated to all fours) vote for you to be President because of those two statements, that adds further.

If that's the case, then, where does that stop?

Clue:  It doesn't.  There are two very real reasons I use "The Purge Prayer", as I call it, on this blog:

1) The mere existence of certain demographics is seen as a stain on the mortal souls of those of the dominant demographic.

and 2) If he and his (and I think DeSantis would get us closer to this point -- because I think Pudding-To-Mouth Disease in Florida actually has the guts to at least start to pull it off!) get re-elected, I see that becoming a reality in this country, very quickly.

I could sit here and list any number of reasons that would end badly for me -- but let's remember that I spent almost a decade homeless in San Francisco.  That, especially given the "blue hive" mentality of how many Americans view the American cities, would be enough to see me gone.

But the other part of why I say this falls under a window of "This Blog Should Not Exist" is the explosion in talk of threats once Saint Donald of Jabba The Hutt is arrested.

I read one Tweet last Friday night propose that the war begins on Monday (this past Monday).  Protip, moron:  The Second American Civil War started with the George Floyd killing and riots three years ago!   

I read of one proposal of a 10,000-man human shield around Mar-A-Lago to protect him.

And two protests in New York might've drawn 20 people -- between them.

I have some statements and some questions for the White Right Men's Rights Movement in this country, known as the Oathkeepers/Proud Boys/Republican Voter Base/etc.:

1. You want to get crime in the cities under control?  The Second Amendment, as the courts have MISapplied it, gives you the framework.  Get your gun out of your anus, turn your camera off, put your clothes on, and get busy.
2. Do you honestly believe that you will get inflation or the money supply under control in this country (as the Conservative/Libertarian movements would desire it) without the immediate removal of half the American population...

Oh, that reminds me.  It's time to call Karl Denninger a hypocrite -- I believe again...

In comments to an article today on his The Market Ticker blog on the latest Federal Reserve day of meeting -- today -- on discussion of the raising of interest rates.

He responded, and threatened to ban, a disagreeing user on the interest/money supply policies needed to be done thusly:

"So the cry rooms and dead Americans it is for you [other user redacted]?  Care for a banhammer sandwich considering that a million people are dead as a direct result of that bullshit?"

First off, Karl:  It's not one million and you know it.  Think at least an order of magnitude higher -- and it's your own exposition of some of the cooking of the numbers which is PART of the reason I draw that conclusion.

(Another part is Long COVID:  A supposedly encouraging survey of five million in the hospital says Long COVID is down to about 1 in 16 Omicron cases.  But what if everyone in the country has had COVID, as many believe?  That's the better part of 22 million people!!)

Second, Karl:  Especially as a Libertarian who is into shunning people and the eradication of the medical industry, etc. -- isn't a mass-death to COVID event what you **WANT**?  (Especially to the believed demographics most susceptible to die to it, as you've said on your blog three years now!)  The problem you have is that you don't have control over the process, and you have no means to get that control, for you have the same cowardice the Proud Boys have!

Dovetailing back to that general list, here's some questions you should ask your remaining close Republican friends:

• If you are that certain that the 2020 election was stolen, why did you allow the Congress to seat?  Because the moment they named Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House, even a protracted dispute over the Presidency would not allow your man to remain in power past January 20th (of 2021) at noon.
• If you are that certain that the 2020 election was stolen, why did you allow the 2022 midterm election to take place?  
• Did you not realize that, on January 6th, 2021, you had significant inside help in the Capitol (Capitol Police, Secret Service, etc. -- portions of all sympathetic to Trump), and that all you really needed was the nutsack between your legs and open fire, and it's Game Over (in all conceivable matters) for the rest of us?  You'd literally have gotten to the "Biden can call a press conference, Trump can call in the 82nd Airborne" situation people have talked about in such a scenario.
• Or is it literally that you can't do anything without Trump's permission?
• Why are you not literally raising militias to seize the "blue hives"?  Why are you not seizing state governments like the West Coast states to reverse everything from city crime to homelessness to "Woke" wars, etc.?

I could go on, if people want, but start with those five (sets of) questions.  And then understand in how many different ways, non-personally, that would mean my end.