(Yep, another unscheduled part.)
And another unscheduled part based on a post by Karl Denninger on The Market Ticker. I'll react to both the post and the comments section (or at least the first two pages thereto).
In Denninger's continuing call to dismantle the public American education system, this post completely forgets some very concrete facts which basically distill down to one thing:
We have a bunch of the Libertarians on that site who agree with the racist views of Scott Adams, but forget openly another part of his views, endemic to this particular situation: The fact that you have only two options on violent youth: Watch other people die, or kill them yourself, even if it's your own child.
Today's Denninger screed has but only real, honest, legitimate, and intellectually correct response:
GET YOUR GUN OUT OF YOUR ANUS, GET YOUR CLOTHES ON, SHUT YOUR SOCIAL-MEDIA CAMERA OFF, AND SHOOT US!!
Adams himself would tell you fuckers the same thing! And, on top of that, it isn't simply my view on Libertarianism (that the sole source of personal responsibility in America comes at the hot end of another person's smoking gun).
1) Dingleberry: "Separate a people from the consequences of their actions....you get a nation of fools."
It isn't just a function of there being no consequences, but the consequences which DO exist would actually be improvements on many of these people's lives -- real or perceived.
Let's get right down to brass tacks, Karl: If society could tolerate most youth to be out and about during the day, there'd be no need for school. We miseducate our children grossly on the first part, and there's no benefit at all for some children not to go to jail or prison (just like there isn't for an increasing number of adults).
I was literally out getting food at a local restaurant two days ago. Two older people walked in and promptly marched off, unchallenged, with two mobile orders about $75 in total. A third homeless man got the third call to the cops to that place in about 30-40 minutes. And I can tell you, without question, none of the three would've given a damn about "consequences" or anything else of that ilk.
Another anecdote is the basis for the post: The Denver death of a 17-year-old who admittedly had no business on the outside and shot two school administrators trying to pat him down. Prison would have been better for him -- and he'd already been expelled from another school just two months before!
A third: Some point in my homeless stint in San Francisco, I bought a liter of Vanilla Coke and was immediately accosted by a White idiot wanting it. If the cops had not shown up within about another 10 seconds, he'd have gotten it -- over his head...
But this has nothing to do with a lack of consequences, because the "consequences" are of no deterrent to them. The only real deterrent the law has had for DECADES is prison rape, as one good example. What are you going to do, hire "Bubba" as a disciplinary feature of the school -- and you get enough trouble from a student, it's backdoor party time?
Jail is ZERO DETERRENT. The only reason I haven't reoffended with Ms. Gibson is I DIDN'T WANT TO -- and, even then, with the laws in question, is there really a point to having released me at all? (You'll get that in about 60 days in Part Three of this series.)
2) Denninger: "State Constitutions may provide, and the Federal government may demand, that a "free public education" and "to the limits of each student's ability" each district is "obligated" to provide same, irrespective of cost disparity, but the last 20+ years of this crap has led to the premise that a student who is incapable of doing grade-level work or is disruptive to the class or school environment, whether with outbursts or even violence, cannot be and is not immediately and permanently removed from said class environment."
Only way you are doing that -- not only as a function of law enforcement, but also as an economic function, an education function, a societal function -- is to shoot the kid. Especially if you agree with the racist Adams.
The situation in Denver is a nice example of why you can't even jail or imprison the kid and expect him to improve. Even for those of us only BELIEVED to want to be violent (see myself vs. Ms. Gibson), jail is a perfect environment to learn there is only one solution to most problems with other people in this society -- you either make it clear that you will force an answer/conduct from the other party or you won't get one!
In society, we call this a "threat". Some call it a terrorist act. But the fact is, to what gain, to a lot of these people, is doing a damn thing that needs to be done? That can be teachers as well as students.
3) And here's the money shot from Denninger: "If you advocate for leaving such individuals in the school system where other, peaceful kids are -- no matter the mix between the two in terms of percentages -- you are a criminal and should be expelled from society to starve and when you die of starvation your carcass and that of your entire family should be left to rot so your highest and best function, that of food for turkey vultures, is fulfilled."
Then you should immediately be identifying those children and eliminating them and their parents from the gene pool RIGHT NOW.
You'd have killed me by age ten, by the way, under the same concept. By eight or nine (I forget if this was before or after my mother died, but it was in that one year), my family was exploring expulsion from the house for me to a reform school. Some in my family have believed, at least for a time, my misconducts (decades before Gibson) killed my mother through stress -- and, if they did that, I got them both -- my dad seven or eight years later.
But the fact remains, Karl, if you believe this bullshit you're spewing: On every conceivable level, you need to eliminate (KILL) anyone in society who you believe (and can get past a jury of twelve) to have no other purpose than as food -- for turkey vultures or as (as you've said a number of times) "long pork" for your own consumption.
Because, even on a more baseline level: We take your resources, we increase your costs (inflation/money supply), we have destroyed any hope you have of a national infrastructure (because the largest city you MIGHT permit in a "new America" of your creation can't be more than about 50-100K in population), etc.
4) User "Joancrawford": "I've come to the realization that nothing short of segregation will fix this mess. Most blacks will not tolerate any rules comin' down from "da white mon", so let them create their own little hells scape skoos."
That segregation, Joan, would have to be more than just separate schools. You can't have us in your economy or even presence (and that's more than Black/White) -- and trying to starve us out just would mean we would have nothing to lose by attempting to rob you -- we're dead anyway if it gets that far.
4A) To emphasize the point, she added: "Addendum to my above screed: Todd was a very large boy who approached me one day with a raging hard-on and attempted to rape me during school hours. I escaped before one of his buds started toward me to hold me down. I told no one and of course nothing was done. Todd was periodically suspended throughout the school year, which he considered a vacation. This was, btw, in a very wealthy school district in Arlington, Virginia."
He had value, Joan -- hence, he had the right to rape -- and, trust me, if your report of him already being hard is true (and I have no dispute to it), you would not have been his first rape of that day or even that part of the day.
My guess is that he was an athlete, between his school suspensions. You would think, at some point, that if that was on the table, there would be (if there were such a right in general) the right to basically make it clear that one more step and his parents can collect his body.
5) User "Rporth": "Homeschool or die. I know a gal who recently quit her job teaching 2nd graders in Rapid City of all places. Kids acted up so bad they removed the chairs, kids out of control. Fbombs constantly. No discipline."
Rapid City, SD. You'd think, with that governor of yours, they'd basically take a National Guardsman to that school, walk in front of the class, pump his shotgun once, and make a last stand to get the point across.
Look, I was a piece of work in school (see above). But if it's THAT BAD, someone's gotta get froggy against them or nothing is ever going to get done.
Karl's daughter Sarah went through there (and this is with one of the more virulent MAGA governors and not the nation's largest city in any respect!), and could not stay one more moment than necessary because of the feral zoo it had become.
I could go on, but it comes down to one fact: You want better? You're going to have to shoot your way to better.
I could make a very real case today that the Deagel Group 70% kill off in the next 33 months either must happen or damned close, and you idiots on the Right better make sure it's the 50-70% you want gone.
So get started or shut the fuck up. You hate it now? Just wait...
No comments:
Post a Comment