I read my enemies, so that when I know what they are trying to do to us, I know what I'm talking about.
So I do read Karl Denninger's The Market Ticker occasionally to get an idea of how Libertarians and like-minded Republicans want to see us killed.
He's one of the reasons I'm now convinced that, had we lived in his America, I not only am taken out at age 12, but with the full blessing of family and community -- and let's just say some "long pork" is cooked and consumed afterward.
He had his article last night regarding the Roe v. Wade reversal leak. But that's not specifically what I want to talk about.
I want to talk about this forum post from a user "Bzelbob" from the Bigots Republic of Florida.
He lists several theories on why he believes some left-winger (another commenter purports Biden himself did it -- I'd like to know how he got his hands on it, this appears to be an internal document of the Court. My theory that Justice Breyer did it, for whatever reason, would hold far more merit!) may have leaked this decision now.
So I'll go over the list and give my theories:
- Putin has won the Ukraine, and all the whining going with it.
Not sure I can buy that, because Putin, as a master strategist, has to realize he holds all the current cards. Trump is almost certainly the next meaningful President, or another Russian asset. He can use the nuclear threat to hold off the world until he is in a far better political position than he is now with Biden in office.
And here's the kicker: Putin can take as much of Europe as he wants. He can basically, should they choose, work with Xi to take the entire Eastern Hemisphere without much meaningful challenge ("I have nukes and I will use them... Nyah nyah nyah."), and send the Western Hemisphere back to 15th century relevance.
Putin's version of the world is probably a duo-polar between Russia and China, with the Americas basically run by one or more Russian asset plants.
- Housing collapse due to White Flight from the blue cities.
Certainly, more than a few White Republicans are leaving the cities, and that is the clarion call of the American Right. Eventually, for them to retake this country, they will need to either militarily subjugate or obliterate urban America.
The problem is: Regardless of HOW they get there, the housing collapse spoken of must happen -- even by Denninger's thought process. You would think, at some point, a personal-responsibility Libertarian such as Karl Denninger would be calling for the proactive death (as in, 2A shoot us first) of the Leftward at least 30% of this country (he has said that the country must reverse the leverage-economics expansion of the last 40 years -- that's the population increase thereto), and probably double that.
He speaks of shunning and starving the irresponsible -- not realizing that, past a certain point, "If I'm going to be killed, you're going with me!" So there's going to be a Deagel Group-level (or close) kill-off in this country in the next not-that-many years (Deagel believes 70%, and 2 1/2 years left to get there).
- Stock Market Crash due to the Fed finally being forced to raise rates to the point the economy cannot be sustained.
We are probably far closer than we wish to admit to that proactive call -- because, if any degree of mathematical Dennigerian reality is imposed on this country, every benefit program dies instantaneously (you're probably looking 15-20% COLA into next year at this rate) and everyone reliant on them, shortly afterward (and then see the quote above for what happens next).
The call to end deficit spending is being made that the Federal Reserve is now forced to raise rates beyond that which anything can be sustainable. At that point, a crash of the stock market, and far more, is similarly inevitable.
Not only that, but if I were ever to meet Denninger, I'd want a T-shirt made first that I could wear: "Math lies. I'm living proof."
- A full tally of the "Died Suddenly" becomes too large to ignore.
That's another one I do believe will happen, and soon. I've said, at least once, here that I believe we are deliberately underreporting COVID deaths in this country by at least a factor of five.
Yes, five million -- and data Denninger has presented on his own website is part of the reason why. That "roll number" of the 16+ non-institutional population (which the BLS promptly cleaned up and "scrubbed" first of this year) is one reason. I have also made note of the comparative at-birth life expectancy for the USA in a UN model without COVID vs. a CDC number with it. (It's at least 2% lower.) Several studies which indicate COVID is far more prevalent in our society than admitted are also used.
There are two reasons you won't see that situation happen unless and until forced: The first is the same I said about China 2 1/2 years ago on Zerohedge before I was banned from there for being a liberal and willing to bash skulls: The reality of the death toll, before we get to how, would cause a freak-out.
And then, ESPECIALLY in America with the recalcitrant Right, the moment that number is revealed, it would be thrown square in the laps of the vaccine, when it should be clear to anyone that the Right has wanted a significant kill-off, and this virus is giving them the opportunity of a lifetime, and the pussies don't even need to fire a shot.
- The long-predicted collapse of the health-care system...
If there's one thing Karl has demanded of the societally responsible in this country, it is to get out of the health care system, be healthy, or be offed because the system itself is not sustainable.
He may well be right (and, if he is, it's too late for me), on both sides:
One is the obvious fraud and entitlement programs and all that. The other is the moment the gravy train stops for the medical profession, how many people in it just WALK, never having believed in the Hippocratic Oath and wanting to be a doctor simply to get paid?
- The supply chain completely breaks down...
How this has not happened in North America the last 2 1/2 years, I have no clue.
- I took this one out of order, and there's been at least another commenter who's made the theory as well: Biden is about to step down and hand the Presidency to Kamala Harris.
Doing so before the midterms (now and not a year or so ago) is a surrender, at this point. And some believe it is a surrender the DNC is about to order.
You have several problems if you do that, of which I'll highlight three: The first is that Harris is factually even less popular than Biden. That means you have to have a savior from the Left ready to go in 2024, if you get that far. (I'll get to the italicized in a second.)
The second is, doing it now means you concede a bloodbath in the midterm elections, which may functionally finish Harris' Presidency before it even starts AND reinstall Trump as late as January 3, 2023. (The Speaker of the House does NOT have to be a member of that body.) Any intelligent person sees what the situation is going to be from there.
The third, because of the first, is that it now only takes one bullet, past 1/3/23, to reinstall the likes of Trump, instead of two.
The only case for doing so now (or in similar timeframe) vs. before is the understanding that not only will you lose the Senate in the midterms, but that the mathematical impossibility of replacing the Vice President in a palatable manner (50-50 no tiebreaker vote means no replacement VP is installed) will no longer, then, apply.
I've never believed Biden would serve out his term -- I felt in 2020 he'd be long gone by now. I never believed it was the intention to have Biden serve any feasible length of time!
- The commenter basically left a spot for "anything else which might come up of that level", and this is where I get to the italicized of if the Dems make it to 2024 at all: How about a non-QAnon case for the revocation of the 2020 Presidential Election?
Joe Biden won 306 Electoral Votes in 2020, and every one of them was cast for him.
About 40% of the votes in the Pennsylvania election were cast by mail, a practice which the state courts of Pennsylvania have ruled in violation of the state Constitution twice now, including a ruling in early 2022.
As a result, and since the Federal courts have long ruled the states are the arbiters of each individual elector slate's election, the 20 Electoral Votes in Pennsylvania are now functionally void.
There has been a long-standing argument in Georgia (involving the ACLU and people calling the Republican movement in the state "Jim Crow 2.0") that upwards of 200,000 voters on the Georgia rolls (yes, largely Black people) never should've been allowed on the rolls, including at least 20% of the entire voter roll of the Georgia city of Sparta.
Biden shockingly took Georgia by a miniscule 12,000 votes.
A friendly decision or two could void those 16 Electoral Votes, leaving Biden at the minimum 270.
Now, I can't go further than that without a far deeper dive of research, but I don't think I need to tell you, with the number of Republican states trying to restrict mail voting, etc., that the Republicans probably believe they would have a case to find more.
So what stops the following from occurring on January 3, 2023?
- The House names a new Speaker. For the purposes of convention, let's say it's Donald Trump.
- Someone (let's just spitball it's Marjorie Taylor Greene) puts forth a binding resolution revoking the January 6, 2021 Congressional consent of the Biden Presidency and ordering the immediate Oath of Office of the newly-elected Speaker as the 47th President of the United States (or the 48th, if Harris IS put in office first). This, on the basis of the intervening information that the Electoral Votes of Pennsylvania are void (even this, I will no longer dispute), Georgia probably is (this, I will dispute), and at least one other Electoral Vote to ensure the 12th Amendment majority is no longer upheld.
- At that point, the Congress adjourns sine die (without date, meaning they ARE DONE) until the transition is made, cutting off all further appropriations, etc. -- and daring Biden to sue into the same six-conservative Roberts Court which just revoked Roe and will take every civil-rights protection of the last 75 years with it!
- It also authorizes the new President (let's say Trump) to use whatever means the Commander in Chief requires. Meaning martial law and probably a high-level military showdown.
- The Congress does not return until the new President is respected.
Let's say that is working in the backchannels of the Republican Party. You think some liberal would not want to front-run that before it got any steam?