Then, this morning, the gunman took his own life.
He has been identified as former NFL player Philip Adams -- murdering 5, including an entire family of a prominent doctor in the area (with 5 and 9 year old children in the victim count), plus someone working at the place.
This isn't only far past time to #RepealThe2nd -- but even Adams' father has already come out and all but announced Adams was sufficiently fucked up by football to serve himself and five others to the altar of the sport through a crazed mass shooting.
A six year NFL career ended in 2015, and it's clear that a crazed combination of the sport and it's complete reliance on the disregard for the human condition has now killed 5 innocents.
But that's all right, right??? That's 5 less we have to worry about because of FOOBAW!!!
We'll have to see what the test shows now that this guy has passed. He probably has CTE.
ReplyDeleteAlso, this is a tragedy of epic proportions. However, I don't think that taking guns from Americans is the answer.
Both sides (Reps and Dems. I don't identify myself as either. I don't believe in federal or state government, but local egalitarian government by and for the people or direct democracy) want to take guns away, not just the liberals. It is a control and enslavement issue, just like the measures for COVID (I don't think this disease is fake. I know people that have had it. However, the masks and social distancing have been about control, not for our benefit. And, I don't see myself taking the vaccine).
It doesn't make sense. If this guy hit people with a car, would we start banning cars tomorrow? Of course not.
We would, however, start banning the usage of cars by those unfit to do so. The fact is: The courts are wholly wrong on any number of this and similar subjects.
ReplyDeleteIf you truly had (to extend your example) the right to use the conveyance of the day, then why are you licensed before you can drive?
I just think you have to understand that if you believe the people to be a militia, then those same people should have the right to, as a militia, identify an enemy and eliminate it under rules of engagement of military combat. I hope you realize, in how ridiculous that would sound, as to how ridiculous the concept of the people as a militia is in actuality.
As far as COVID goes: If this is about control to the extent that some believe it is, then that control must eventually extend to eliminative control -- not unlike what I believe would be taking place with the initial deaths in China being (in that scenario) elimination of low social credit scores.
But we, as a nation, are unfit for the civilian usage of guns. I guarantee you personally that I would probably be a serial shooter if I had one. Does that mean I have no other rights either?