More on the Wideman Situation

• According to the Flames' telecast on SportsNet West (Canada) last night, both the remaining steps Wideman has have danger:  Both Bettman and the independent arbitrator could increase the suspension. 
• According to that same telecast (picked up on the NHL.TV package), the NHL Officials Association is not happy with Wideman getting only 20 games.  It wasn't unhappy enough for a work action (there was at least one statement implying such if the suspension was only 10), though several people watching the NHL Officials Association thought 20 was sufficient punishment.  ... which was ridiculous both ways.  If it's intentional, it's a "life ban" offense, and I don't care if the guy has had 11-12 clean seasons.  We have had significant uptick in referee abuse across the board in North America, and it needs to be stopped, whatever the cost -- IF THE HIT WAS INTENTIONAL.  But, that said...
• The potential appeals to Bettman (which will happen:  the NHLPA immediately appealed) and the independent arbitrator could get really sticky, and could go to the court system -- the NHL is already facing a lawsuit, similar to the NFL's, on concussion issues.  It was obvious to several people I've talked to that he was concussed, and that is why Deadspin has an article today that the NHL is actively fearing Wideman's defense, because it could be used against the league in court.  If the suspension is upheld (or especially if it is increased!), Wideman could immediately add his name to the lawsuit, stating that the fact he was boarded into the boards head-first, was diagnosed with a concussion (which has led in the past to players checking teammates), and then suspended as if the hit on the ref was intentional means the league has no desire to protect players from head injuries and their after-effects.
• To that statement's merit, no suspension for the hit from Player Safety.