I think I now know why I couldn't embed those: Account was suspended for saying the ICE shooter shouldn't get the Medal of Honor, but a noose around his neck instead.
Anyway, upon reinstatement after another week off, ANOTHER PLAY from the Bills-Broncos farce.
This is the play which ended Buffalo's one overtime possession. Watch carefully.
I still think the Bills got screwed on this call.
— Jon Root (@JonnyRoot_) January 18, 2026
At worst, it’s a simultaneous catch, which = Bills completion.
There’s no way this should have been a Broncos interception. He didn’t even have possession until the Bills receiver hit the ground
pic.twitter.com/OZtBrCgWk7
Here's the worst part of this whole exercise: There's a good chance, under the wording of The Catch Rule, that the call IS correct.
Now, we know the reality of The Catch Rule: A catch is a play result which will benefit the team the NFL wants to win.
But, under "Survive The Ground", he does not survive the ground with the ball -- the Broncos defender does.
But there's the classic "but to the but": Cooks is down by contact with the ball and rolls over before McMillan takes the ball out.
Under "Survive The Ground", he is down by contact with possession but no catch.
So what then? Incomplete?
This was another Walmart fix.
ReplyDeleteNot clear on what that means... Not saying you're wrong.
DeleteThe Walton-Penner group (owners of Walmart) owns the Broncos. I believe (like these guys do) that they don't want to draft and develop, but they want to pay off the other team to win:
DeleteDenver Broncos vs Buffalo Bills 2024 WC game Mile High Masterminds
This is after last year's WC game.
Once the Bad Bunny stuff took hold, I think it's absolutely clear who the decision-makers want to win...
Delete